Climate change is our reality.

It's happening here and now, not elsewhere or in the future. It touches every aspect of life. But that reality is still largely absent from our on-screen stories.

The Climate Reality Check is a simple tool to evaluate whether our climate reality is being represented in films, TV shows, and other narratives. It's inspired by the Bechdel-Wallace Test, which measures gender representation.

The Climate Reality Check asks whether, in a given story:

  • Climate change exists,
  • And a character knows it.

Who is this test for?

The Climate Reality Check is a tool that will allow writers and industry professionals to interrogate their own stories, audiences to see whether Hollywood is representing their reality on-screen, and researchers to measure whether climate change is included in any group of stories or if representation is increasing over time.

How do I use this test?

The Climate Reality Check is exactly that: a reality check for narratives. You can use it to test any story set on Earth, which takes place now, in the recent past, or in the future. It doesn't apply to high fantasy or to stories set on other planets or in the distant past.

To use the Climate Reality Check, just apply these two statements to any narrative:

Climate change exists

You can measure whether the climate crisis exists in the world of the story as shown through impacts and solutions. Perhaps the story portrays an unprecedented heat wave, a news story about rising sea levels, or graffiti concerning climate change.

A character knows it

A character’s awareness of climate change can be demonstrated through dialogue, narration, actions, or visual imagery. Perhaps a character’s narration establishes the climate context, a character is shown reading a news article about climate change, or there is a conversation about extreme weather.

Why use the test?

Climate change touches every aspect of life, so it’s only natural for it to show up in our stories, and for creators to include it in their work.

This is about highlighting authentic stories that reflect the reality we're all living in and help us navigate what it means to be human in the age of climate change.

The Climate Reality Check does not suggest or require that every story center climate change, nor does it prescribe what kinds of stories filmmakers should tell. It simply measures whether our current climate reality is being reflected on-screen. How that is done, friends, is up to you.

Read more about the Climate Reality Check and how to apply it.

Test Results: 2024 Oscar Nominees

Last year was the hottest year in recorded history, and our planet is currently warmer than it's been in at least 125,000 years. We wanted to know if the most critically acclaimed films of the year reflected this reality. To find out, a research team led by Dr. Matthew Schneider-Mayerson used the Climate Reality Check to analyze the films that received Oscar nominations in 2024.


The Results

Thirty-one fictional, feature-length films received Oscar nominations in 2024. Of those, thirteen fit our inclusion criteria: stories set in the present or near future, on Earth, in this universe. Those films were: Barbie, American Fiction, Anatomy of a Fall, Past Lives, May December, Nyad, Mission: Impossible—Dead Reckoning Part One, The Creator, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse, Io Capitano, Perfect Days, The Teachers’ Lounge, and Godzilla Minus One. Each film was coded by two researchers  to ensure accuracy and reliability.

This is the first Oscars year coded using this test, and the results are surprising—in a good way.

Of the nominated films coded, 23% (3 films) passed the Climate Reality Check! Those films were: Barbie, Mission: Impossible—Dead Reckoning Part One, and Nyad.

Of the thirteen Oscar-nominated films we analyzed, three included climate change in their story worlds.

Pie chart divided as such: 23%: Climate change exists in the story world. 77%: Climate change does not exist in the story world.

Of the thirteen Oscar-nominated films we analyzed, three contained at least one character who was aware of climate change.

Pie chart divided as such: 23%: A character is aware of climate change. 77%: No character is aware of climate change.

We hope to see 50% of Oscar-nominated films (that are set on Earth in the present or future) pass the Climate Reality Check by 2027.

We love these climate moments and hope they inspire more:

In Barbie, nominated for eight Academy Awards, we see a quick mention that ties the climate crisis to consumerism. Teenage Sasha (Ariana Greenblatt) lays into Barbie (Margot Robbie): “You set the feminist movement back fifty years, you destroyed girls' innate sense of worth, and you're killing the planet with your glorification of rampant consumerism.” Though the words “climate change” aren't spoken, the tie between “rampant consumerism” and “killing the planet” evokes the climate crisis and connects climate change to one of its root systemic causes. And by juxtaposing feminism and climate concerns (“sexualized capitalism!”), the film makes the intersectional argument that it's all connected, all the same bad guy.

In Mission Impossible, nominated for two Academy Awards, Eugene Kittridge (Henry Czerny) warns Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) that “the next world war isn't going to be a cold one.” He goes on to say, “It's going to be a ballistic war over a rapidly shrinking ecosystem. It's going to be a war for the last of our dwindling energy, drinkable water, breathable air.” Ethan is hunting a rogue AI, a cyberweapon originally developed by the US to prepare for the climate chaos Kittridge evokes. One of the AI's key features is its ability to predict probable outcomes, a skill we might all wish we had as we enter the uncertainty of our climate future

In Nyad, nominated for two Academy Awards, climate change is explicitly mentioned as an obstacle to Diana Nyad's attempt to make history by swimming from Cuba to Florida. On Nyad's third try, she is stung by a box jellyfish, which almost kills her. Her friend and coach, Bonnie Stoll (Jodie Foster), tells a dazed Nyad (Annette Bening), “So the UMiami folks think that the box jellyfish came up off the shallow reef when we left Cuba. Global warming.” Earlier, the team on the boat accompanying Nyad say the box jellyfish “can kill you” and “shouldn't be” in this part of the ocean. Through dialogue in two scenes, climate change is linked to changes in marine animal ranges, which pose threats to individual species, ecosystems, and human health—and threaten the life of the film's protagonist.

Who developed this test?

Good Energy is a nonprofit story consultancy for the age of climate change. Our mission is to support TV and film creators in telling wildly entertaining stories that honestly reflect the world we live in now—a world that's in a climate crisis. We aim to make it as easy as possible to portray the climate crisis on-screen in artful ways, in any storyline, across every genre.

Good Energy CRC team members: Anna Jane Joyner (founder and CEO) is a long-time story  consultant and strategist at the intersection of climate, communications, and storytelling. Carmiel Banasky (editor-in-chief) is a critically acclaimed novelist, WGA TV and feature writer, and audio-drama creator, specializing in climate fiction. Bruno Olmedo Quiroga (director of strategy) is a design researcher, strategist, storyteller, IDEO alum, and cofounder of Maybe Ventures. Design: EJ Baker (creative director) is a visual designer and strategist, IDEO alum, and cofounder of Maybe Ventures. Web Development: Claire Niederberger is a software engineer, creative technologist, and Principal at Be Nice Works.

Matthew Schneider-Mayerson, PhD is associate professor of English and environmental studies at Colby College. His research combines literary criticism with communication studies and qualitative sociology to examine the cultural and political dimensions of climate change, with a focus on climate justice. He is the author or editor of four books, including An Ecotopian Lexicon (University of Minnesota Press, 2019) and Empirical Ecocriticism: Environmental Narratives for Social Change (University of Minnesota Press, 2023).


How did we develop it?

We landed on the two components of the Climate Reality Check after interviewing more than 200 writers, showrunners, executives, and communications experts. Our goal was to ensure the test was easy to use, measurable, and creatively inspiring.

©2024 Good Energy and Colby College
Colby College LogoGood Energy Logo